This is my response to an email in the NIGERIAN CHRISTIAN
SINGLES FORUM
[http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nigerianxtiansingles/message/4384]. I hope
you'll find it helpful.
Hi Guys,
I have followed some of the threads in
this House with keen interest, especially the ones that are gender-sensitive as
this particular mail. I also read with similar gusto all the arguments thrown
back and forth, nodding at some, imbibing some, and discarding some altogether.
However, am quite alarmed to realise
that since the inception this Forum some four years ago, virtually all of the
gender-sensitive mails we have received herein are more inclined in favour of
the women; it is either "How to Treat a Woman", "What Does A Woman
Want", “How To Take Care of A Woman”, "How To Love/Show Affection to
a Woman", "How to Choose Your Man" etc etc (There are about 888
mails focused on Women, what they want, desire, like, aim, should go for,
should choose, among others, on the message board). And the heated debate that
usually ensues when there is a slight counter opinion, especially when a
brother flaws some of the positions, is always amusing. No doubt, most of our
sisters here are very eloquent; they know how to marshal their arguments and
defend their folks. Perhaps this is because women are more vocal than men and
tend to express themselves more freely in comparison.
However, after reading this last
mail by our dear sister, I began to ruminate over a number of things:
1.
Aren’t the women being too self-centred
by their obsession with what/who they want, and how/where/why/when they want
him?
2.
Do women take time to find out what
the kind of man they desire want and try work on or adjust themselves to give
it/them to him the way he wants it/them?
3.
In fact, who should do the
wanting/desiring the most, is it the man or the woman? It seems that the
clamour of the wants/desires of the women have muffled the voice of some men
and bludgeoned them into trying to be desirable and acceptable to the woman at
the expense of their own distinct identity.
No comments:
Post a Comment